Establishing a Clear Scope for CMMC Certification: A Crucial Step

Regardless of what CMMC level your organization is pursuing, defining a clear and precise scope is an essential first step. Without a well-defined scope, organizations risk overspending, compliance gaps, or audit failures. Below, we explore the importance of scoping, common methods for defining scope, tools & techniques to establish boundaries, and best practices for maintaining strong protections between certified and uncertified environments.

Why Defining the Scope for CMMC Matters

CMMC certification isn’t a one-size-fits-all process. Each organization must identify the systems, networks, and processes involved in handling FCI or CUI. A clear scope ensures:

• Cost-efficiency: Properly scoped environments reduce unnecessary costs by focusing resources where they are needed most.

• Audit readiness: Certification assessments become smoother and more predictable when the scope is well-documented and precise.

• Risk reduction: Isolating sensitive data reduces the attack surface and mitigates potential breaches.

Common Methods of Defining Scope

Defining the scope for CMMC certification begins with identifying the assets, systems, and data to be protected. Several common strategies are often used for defining certification scope. These approaches are not the only options for organizations pursuing CMMC compliance—nor must they be mutually exclusive. Each strategy has unique advantages and challenges, and an organization’s choice of approach depends on factors such as budget, operational needs, and the complexity of their handling of FCI or CUI.

The All-In Approach

This approach involves bringing all systems, networks, and processes within the organization into the certification boundary. It’s most useful for organization who primarily or exclusively work on DoD contracts. Using the all-in approach simplifies the compliance process by avoiding complex boundary definitions and reduces the risk of inadvertent boundary violations by reducing the need for network segmentation.

Ultimately, it can be easier to manage and audit a homogeneous and robustly secured IT environment than parceling out areas with substantially different operational and protection requirements. It can also reduce the risk of security incidents originating from within an organization’s uncertified environment which then spread to the controlled environment. However, this approach is generally more expensive to implement and maintain, and it requires all users and systems to adhere to CMMC requirements, even those not handling FCI or CUI.

The Enclave Model

In this method, an organization defines an enclave—a limited subset of users, systems, and processes which are physically or logically isolated from the rest of the organization—as in-scope for certification. This approach can be beneficial for organizations that want to minimize costs and limit the impact of compliance on non-sensitive operations.

Utilizing an enclave allows organization to focus resources on securing the systems which handle FCI or CUI, reducing the scope of certification. This results in lower implementation costs compared to whole-organization scoping. However, it requires strong perimeter protections and effective isolation to prevent boundary breaches, which can be complex to manage and monitor.

Isolation Using VDI

Organizations can establish an entirely separate, virtual IT infrastructure to create a segregated environment for handling FCI or CUI through the use of virtual desktops or similar technologies. Building an isolated virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) environment allows users to access secure virtual desktops dedicated to certified activities.

Isolation via VDI can be especially useful for organizations with remote workforces or those needing extreme separation between certified and uncertified environments. It provides isolation via logically separated systems and strict access control. It’s flexible for remote access and easier to scale than provisioning and deploying new hardware but has a high upfront cost and requires robust IT infrastructure with ongoing management.

Tools and Techniques for Establishing a Boundary

Regardless of an organization’s chosen approach, defining and enforcing boundaries involves leveraging tools and techniques to ensure that certified environments are well-isolated.

• Network Segmentation: Separating CMMC-applicable systems from other parts of the network using firewalls, virtual LANs (VLANs), and/or dedicated subnets.

• Data Classification Tools: Employing software that tags and tracks sensitive data to ensure it stays within the certified environment.

• Access Control: Implementing robust access management solutions to limit who can access systems within the scope.

• Monitoring and Logging: Using tools such as a security information and event management (SIEM) platform to track activity and identify potential boundary violations.

Best Practices for Maintaining Strong Perimeter Protections

Once the scope is defined and established, maintaining robust perimeter protections between certified and uncertified environments is crucial for sustaining compliance. The following practices can help organizations stay compliant and avoid data spillage.

• Strict Access Control Policies: Enforce role-based access control (RBAC) and regularly review permissions to ensure only authorized personnel have access to certified environments.

• Continuous Monitoring: Develop a data flow map to document the flow of FCI and CUI through your organization’s systems and maintain a comprehensive asset inventory including hardware, software, and cloud services to determine which systems interact with FCI or CUI. Then, deploy real-time monitoring tools to detect and respond to potential security incidents.

• Training and Awareness: Ensure all users understand the importance of CMMC boundaries and their role in maintaining compliance. If your employees don’t understand your approach or why tools and processes protecting FCI or CUI are in place, they are more likely to make mistakes in their handling of such data.

• Take Self-Assessments Seriously: While it can be tempting to treat interim self-assessments as trivial, investing in a thorough review of and revisions to your organization’s scope and implementation to account for changes in systems, processes, or organizational structure can help prevent scope creep—or worse, spillage of FCI or CUI to unauthorized systems and individuals. Learn more about the importance of self-assessments in our post Don't Overlook Level 1: Foundations of CMMC Success.

Conclusion

Establishing a clear scope for CMMC certification is a crucial step in achieving compliance and protecting sensitive information. By employing effective tools & techniques, organizations can not only meet certification requirements but also build a resilient cybersecurity posture.

At Triumvirate Cybersecurity, we specialize in guiding organizations through the CMMC certification process, from scoping to audit preparation and beyond. Contact us today to learn how we can help secure your path to CMMC success.

Review Our Service Offerings